Productivity Paradox

: Implications and ChallengesIntroductionOne system that focuses on the relationship of productiveness and randomness engine room is the productiveness puzzle or the Solow calculating machine riddle . The puzzle was positive from the observation , if not aphorism , do by economist Robert Solow that You can see the computer ripen over unless in the productiveness statistics (Greenan et al 2002 ,. 42 . The object of this is to evaluate the significance of the paradox in directly s industries . Conditions and constraints to give or contradict the productivity paradox result be determined from the studies and re new-fangledd literature . At the complete of the subject , the will be able to discuss the chemical mechanism of the theory and determine its relevance todayUnderstanding the ParadoxThe productivity paradox stat es that as newfound teaching engine room is introduced to the descent dish up , there is a tendency for work productivity to lessen (McGovern , 2001 . This contradicts the motivation for technology which is supposed to increase productive competencies . The observations to fend for the paradox were do based on process and productivity analysis made on the 1970 s focus automation of business processes which induct not yielded productivity and at times have been seen as the provoke of process lock ups (Cohen et al . 2004 . If the paradox is true , then expert upgrading can become pernicious to productivityOne of the evidence to support the report has been the decline in return disproportionate with investments in information technology since the 1960 s which coincides with the advent of automation and digitization of business processes (Berman et al , 200 . Also , computers and information processing equipment represent a very small role of capital stock and porcine domestic products in commonplace (Cohen et! al 2004 .

This relates to the founding infix of the paradox that cites is absence in productivity analysis or productivity statistics as sooner observed by Solow (Greenan et al , 2004Developing SolutionsAdvocates of information and technology ontogeny claim that the paradox was disable , citing that technology was not the flat coat for the reduction in productivity but macroeconomic conditions and industrial developments as the main sheath (Castells , 2000 . By the late 1990 s , a significant number of economists such(prenominal) as Paul David , Dan Sichel and Erik Brynjolfsson have developed studies to determine the r igourousness of the productivity paradox (Hempell , 2005 . Explanations for the decline in productivity include the need for a technology to be normal in the lead its true productivity can be measured . In such a scenario , then late adaptors of a technology , such as less technically driven economies , ar less vulnerable to productivity paradoxes because by the time they deduct access to technologies , there are already significant software and applications availableFor example , In David s study , he concluded that the lag in productivity in computer automation develops from the drop of channels where the technology can be used . choose voice over internet protocol communications (VOIP ) from the billet of information technology industries . The use of IP protocols was traditionally pore on data transmission but with the development...If you want to pull in a full essay, rescript it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: wr! ite my paper