HENRY THE II

HENRY THE II         Some history movies provide viewers with development and knowledge on a certain causa; however, the crush(p) history information can be obtained through books, and literature. two(prenominal) the social lion in Winter and Becket hand their standardizednesses, but they withal have their differences. henry the II was an great figure in Eng earth and his character and family played an important role in the finality devising for the succeeding(a) kingdom. Both movies be same in that they constitute enthalpys intellectual perception; however, the movies are non similar in the verbal description and the character of enthalpys family.         The description of henrys intelligence in both movies is similar. In the movie Becket, henry uses both surfaceline and intelligence when choosing to sterilise Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury. His rea discussioning in making Becket Archbishop was because once Henr y had both church and state on his side, then there would be nonhing stopping him. regrettably for Henry, he did not count of Becket to stupefy a ? divine man and a man of God. In a Lion in Winter, Henry was involved in a discussion with Louis of France in which they discussed apiece some others moves. It was during this discussion that Henry proves his intelligence as sanitary as his cunning strategy. Henry, through his slowness with Louis, was able to capture out how Louis worked and what his plans were without cock-a-hoop away his countersink or give tongue to him a thing. Henry too used strategy when it came to his relationships to Alyce and Eleanor. By controlling both Eleanor and Alyce, Henry was able to lionise Alyces land and at the same time, keep Eleanors aquatane in check. By retention Eleanor locked up, Henry was able to plaintu completelyy pursue Eleanor to sign oer the aquatane in return for her freedom. With this deal beingness set, Henry be came proprietor of almost half of England, t! hus increase his power. Through strategy and positioning, Henry was able to conquer over enemies and obtain gigantic masses of land, thus revealing his intelligence.         The differences between the two movies was not in Henrys character but in the character of his family. In Becket, Henrys family was an insignificant part of his kingdom. His wife, the mighty Eleanor of Aquataine, was shown stitching in her contain without regard or pity to Henrys problems. She was portray as an insignificant, and a harmless character. Henrys mom, when seeing Thomas Beckets criminal prosecution in Henrys court, verbalize that it was beneficial that Becket was finally being interpreted down, after all he had caused a lot of put out upon herself and Henry. Henry showed at this moment that he favored his near friend, Thomas Becket over his family by telling her that he sock Thomas even when he hated him, and he did not love her. Henry had no regard for his mother. After all, she had left him at a young age. Henry showed no love for his wife, Eleanor, nor did he care to the highest degree her. When she talked of Thomas Becket, he cursorily shut her up, not caring to hear her opinion. Henry as well as appeared to not like his children. In single scene, Henry is shown giving his son, Henry the III, a dinner in his name because he is to become the future king. Henry remarks round his sons stupidity trance sitting at the table, he says something along the lines of Look at you, you pig. Even when I give you the glory you still dont pee-pee it. Henry lieu no care about his sons emotions nor does he care about his son. In a Lion in Winter, Henrys family is seen in a totally different perspective. It appears, in many another(prenominal) different cases that Henry loves his wife, Eleanor. When both of them are sitting in front of the fireplace after their sons had betrayed Henry, they had a talk about the Aquataine and about each other. They discuss what it was like before, when t! hey were happy and in love, and they showed their emotions by kissing. Henry is seen as someone with emotion and Eleanor is seen as a loving, free-enterprise(a) lover. Henrys sons are also seen different. Henry loves his son bum the most, and he tells all three sons this while they are in the dungeon. He tells Richard that he thinks he is strong, smart, and would make a good regulation if he had not sided with Eleanor in the wars. He thinks of Jeffrey as a coniving, plotting and a disloyal son. Henry shows his legitimate emotions about his sons unawares after the curtain scene. Henry has found out that his son John, who he was going to give the kingdom to, had betrayed him and plot against him. He walked through the castle in complete torturing and ail because he had ?no sons anymore. Henrys family is seen as nagging, and insignificant in one movie where as in the other they are shown as loving, competitive, and coniving.         Both movies were somew hat accurate in the boilersuit work out but each had their differences in character. Henry was seen in both movies as an intellectual master bear in mind who plotted and stratagized his all move. However, the movies were different in the portrayal of his family. angiotensin converting enzyme showed his family as a distraction and an insignificant force, while the other showed them as an important part of Henrys kingdom. Hollywood movies are not always the best ways to explain history because their closing is to make coin and not necessarily show true fact. If you want to soak up a full essay, erect it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper