Introduction to Terrorism Essay Example for Free

Introduction to Terrorism EssayThe paper would analyze the commentarys for act of act of terrorism proposed by some authors deeply along with criticizing them and proposing a global definition of terrorism. Secondly, the concept of unsloped fightf atomic number 18 theory would also be evaluated by highlighting its limitations. And finally, just war theory concept would be applied on the recent military action in Afghanistan, whether it sums the scenario or not.Answer -1There atomic number 18 hundreds of definitions of terrorism defined by m both authors, journalists, and politicians. But the problem is that the base or concept of what terrorism actually is, is vague and not perceived globally as a single concept. The definition proposed by Lawless revolves around three key words violence policy-making purpose, and non-state actor. It goes this way, the unlawful threat or act of violence committed for a political purpose by a non-state actor (Lawless, 2007). This definit ion seems to be quite rigid and inflexible because it says that terrorism happens only because of political purposes by the non-state actors. In fact, terrorism does not always take place due to political purposes for instance, these days, countries themselves want to get rid of terrorism that is overwhelming them and worsening their relationships with other(a) countries. There is no doubt that non-state actors are mostly involved in terrorism, but they usually do so for purposes such as, smuggling, harassing the legal authorities who try to resist them, and sure mafias or groups who want to take revenge of any injustice done to them before or universe done.Secondly, the definition does not highlight the idea about the innocent people or victims. Terrorism for political purposes means that riots or revenges are taken for their own sake, purpose, and benefit. The global definition that I propose is that any unlawful or illegal act done to hurt, damage, or overwhelm the party who i s innocent and was not involved in any conspiracy or threatening act against the party who is hurting them. claver more introduction paragraph exampleAnswer 2Just war theory proposes the idea that lies between permissivism and pacifism. Permissivism suggests using arms as many as wanted and as the way the arm forces want to whereas, pacifism says not to use arms against civilians or innocent people but to deplete those who deserve to be pour downed. Therefore, just war theory says that war must be fought when it is fair or when there is a reason to be fought with the enemies or for a legitimate cause (Wilson, 2006). There are certain limitations of this theory such as, it does not define what a legitimate cause actually is and when is it just or fair to attack the enemy (mtholyoke.edu, n.d). Therefore, countries or parties always think of their own interest and suppose their cause as a legitimate one and considerable to attack the enemy, even they may be wrong at their side. Mor eover, not killing civilians is just a saying armed forces often kill and harass the civilians such as, kidnapping them, and smuggling them, etc. So, from here, the desire to take revenge arises in the other party and the issue never resolves, in fact it goes on. I think the idea of just war theory must be reconceptualized.Answer 3The recent military action against Afghanistan does not fit on the concept of just war theory because the American started the raid against them without having solid evidence against them. Moreover, they did not only killed the Afghan terrorists, but also took lives of thousands of innocent people including children, women, and aged ones. They brutally destroyed their houses, properties, lands, lives, and everything.