Literature mary shellys frankenstein Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Literature mary shellys frankenstein - Essay ExampleIt didnt take but a few moments for me to realize the logical extrapolation of the relevancy of Frankenstein. While Victor Frankensteins fictional undertaking took place in the early 19th century, the equal story line- blindly ambitious genius creates a scientific marvel that becomes the source of his mental destruction- has been and is still seen throughout history. In the mid 19th century, Alfred Nobel developed dynamite. His invention made earth-moving projects extremely more affordable, and ushered in a new era of major construction projects. But his ambition to create the worlds best explosive had a dark side. explode would become incorporated into weapons of war, used in assassination attempts, and the cause of many accidental deaths. Alfred Nobel would become haunted by his creation, however, and became especially remorseful, even terrified, when a senseless obituary made him realize the world thought of him as the creator of a tool of destruction. From and then on, Nobels creation haunted him, and he sought-after(a) to make up for what he felt bad for creating, and thus donated most of his wealth to the creation of the Nobel Prize Foundation (NobelPrize.org). Thus, Alfred Nobel, after the fictional Frankenstein, embodied the same general story as the novel. Another, more contemporary example of the relevancy of Frankenstein is the scientist J. ... Oppenheimer, however, would come to be haunted by his creation, just as Victor Franken was. Therefore, Oppenheimer serves as another more contemporary example of the relevancy of Frankenstein today. Of course, the previous examples have not been extremely modern, but this is because we can only see the overlying melodic theme when looking back. Today, Frankenstein is even more relevant since we have even more problems to solve. Increasing technology makes our research more efficient, and this improved rate of research has allowed us to tackle the big que stions, same if we have free will, what dark matter is, and how the universe was created (JupiterScientific.org). The solution to questions like these could have even larger ramifications than Frankenstein faced. Say, for instance, that a brainiac of research undertook an ambitious campaign and managed to discover the reality of dark matter, and was subsequently able to harness it and generate massive amounts of power. But some rogue government, like North Korea, got ahold of the technology, and was able to develop a super weapon. Dark matter then would be developed by all nations with a large array program, The USA, China, Russia, India, etc. all have their own programs, and through research and espionage most major nations of the world get ahold of these dark matter super weapons, which are then used in wars around the globe, making killing even easier. I could see that original researcher would be haunted by the destruction beingness caused by his creation, and would live per petually tormented much like Victor Frankenstein. Now we must examine whether promoting blind ambition is still worth it. Do the pros outweigh the cons of these creations, be if